Posts Tagged ‘wall street’

When being Positive can be Dangerous

Saturday, April 25th, 2009

The mood on Wall Street and in Washington went from a very negative outlook to a relatively positive one in a matter of months. Whether they are trying to stay upbeat or believe that the economy has made a turn, the dangers of being positive might outweigh the benefits.

When President Obama took office nearly every speech he or one of his appointees (Treasury Secretary) made was followed by a negative day on Wall Street. Outlook was grim and reality was settling in with Americans. Now the exact opposite is true, speeches appear to be carefully calculated and responses on Wall Street are more positive.

Wall Street for the most part believes the “bottom” is in. Washington believes the worst is over but we could still have some tough times ahead.

Most of the economic data that spurred the month and a half record breaking rally has started to retrench (retail sales and existing home sale). There are still more down economic data months than up which points to a negative trend.

Wall Street points out to investors that the market historically rallies over 50% after a large correction “bottoms”. The Dow Industrial average touched 6440 in February 2009, if it were to rally 50% then the Dow would be 9660. The Dow Industrial Average was closed at 9034 on January 2, 2009. This “rebound” would leave the Dow Industrial up 6.9% from the beginning of the year.

If the economic data continues to slide and the Market starts another correction, what percentage does it historically go down? It seems mostly the positive view is more statistically backed than the negative view. Being negative could save you money while the positive could make you money, what can you afford?

We are taught it is better to think of the glass as half full; but when you only have half left being negative may be the only way to keep it half full.

Snow Ball Effect

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

Last week the CEO of NYSE Euronext, Duncan Niederauer, told CNBC that the rally over the last month and a half was not spurred by Investors, but by traders. In the interview he cites the rather low volume considering the movement and that the investor still lacks confidence to venture back into the markets. (Read the Article here)

The rally over the past month and a half is the largest move up in a short period of time since the 1930’s. Without “Investors” buying stocks this might end up being the largest bear market rally on record. The market needs investors to buy and hold stocks to build on this already remarkable short term bull move.

Wall Street has burned bridges before and was able to regain the trust of investors rather quickly in the past. Wall Street needs a bull market to survive so obviously they will rally the glimmers of hope while discounting the vast darkness as “already baked in”. Will Investors buy into Wall Street’s “snow ball effect” attempt or have they finally crossed the line?

Wall Street has led you to believe that the market leads the economy by about 6 months. Wall Street leading the market assumes that the Investor will follow. Recent polls have shown that the majority of Americans do not currently trust Wall Street. Investors have already lost so much over the past year, have they had enough? Americans are spending less and saving more. Will they sacrifice more so they can risk more?

Turning Ordinary Metal into Gold – The Modern Day Alchemists on Wall Street

Monday, April 20th, 2009

File:HermesTrismegistusCauc.jpgHundreds of years ago Kings and Queens where captivated by Alchemists who claimed to be able to turn ordinary metal into gold. Alchemist preyed on the wealthy to pay for their lifestyle and experimentation into this so called science of the time. By all accounts some alchemists where true believers, but more were just looking to dupe the wealthy out of their riches.

Today most of us view Alchemy as ridiculous and wonder how so many people in such great power could believe in it. Although today most of us think that the so called science of Alchemy is ludicrous, for some reason we still seem to believe that it is possible to turn ordinary metal into gold, figuratively.

This association was never more obvious than during the technology bubble 10 years ago. A person or group with just an idea was able to solicit millions from investors, before there was even a product. Most of Wall Street made speculations of wealth on the notion of near limitless growth which we now view as absurd. Even after those failed speculations we continue to put faith in Wall Street.

Looking at today it is understandable how the practice of Alchemy had captured the minds of yesterday for so long. As yesterday, on Wall Street there seems to be true believers and frauds (i.e. Bernie Madoff) in the art of turning ordinary metal into gold.

I do not believe all investment advice is the practice of alchemy. I will say though that the use of speculation in investment advice does seem to prey on mans’ fascination of turning ordinary metal into gold.

The mystery and lure of Alchemy was spread by stories from witnesses to this incredible act of turning ordinary metal into gold. It was not until the late 1700’s that this art of deception was revealed. A book was published on how these alchemists deceived witnesses. How many stories have you heard of someone who invested in a stock that made them extremely wealthy (i.e. Microsoft)?

Banks Profitable – That was Easy

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

Okay so here we are again, it is earning season and to the market’s surprise banks are showing some profits. When I make the above statement I can’t help to picture a older man in a suit riding a bike with training wheels saying “Mom look, I can ride a bike”.


All it took was nearly a trillion dollars to suppress mortgage rates; billions of dollars of direct aid, small change to Market to Market accounting and a commitment from the US government indicating they will not them fail.

Meanwhile earnings of companies who do not have the favor of the government are falling rapidly. Housing starts again appear to be retrenching (remember this was a pillar which Wall Street put such angst on citing recovery). A large commercial real estate firm (holds over 200 malls across America) filed for bankruptcy protection today with a disclosed $29.6 billion in assets and $27 billion in liabilities. What banks are on the hook for that?

The US economy cycles through expansion and contraction of credit. This process has occurred for centuries. Since the Federal Reserve started to maintain control of the overnight bank rate the cycles have become somewhat more predictable. This predictability occurs because as the Federal Reserve identifies where the US economy is in a cycle it responds with a rather predictable action. This action has a somewhat predictable response.

When the economy approaches over expansion of credit the Federal Reserve raises the overnight bank rate to raise the cost of lending, which theoretically should slow growth. When the economy starts to contract credit, the Federal Reserve lowers the overnight bank rate to lower the cost of lending, which theoretically should spur growth.

The actions to save banks over the past year are meant to contribute to the above mentioned goal. The US Government and Federal Reserve are attempting to reduce the cost of lending to spur growth. The dilemma that is facing the United States is that currently its citizens are contracting out of fear. The average US citizens’ mindset has changed from over consumption to conservation. Since US consumers makes up about 70% of GDP, growth cannot occur without them.

To stabilize the US consumer you most likely need to improve unemployment to reduce this fear. This week showed an improvement in claims (attributed to the holiday week) but continued claims are still rising (over 6 million). This indicates that finding a job is still a challenge. For job growth to resume, someone needs to start hiring. The US government is attempting to take this role artificially with their behemoth stimulus they passed.

It appears the US government is attempting to put training wheels on its economy by trying to shoulder the weight on their own. These banks that have already had the training wheels attached are profitable off the actions of the US government, at the expense of the US taxpayer. I was under the impression that companies went out of business because not enough business to support them. What happens when (if?) the US government takes off the training wheels? Will the economy ride on its own or break a leg?

A Real Economic Indicator

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Yesterday consumer spending started back down the path of contraction. Remember one of the major sparks for the March rally was the improved retail sales numbers. It is funny how a once very pessimistic market can turn overly optimistic in such a short period of time.


Wall Street and the US government rely heavily this economic data for their analysis of the economy and its current state. Interesting how this data did not reveal the current state of the economy sooner. A year ago very few could have predicted the current crisis and its depth. It would seem that this method of data collection is too slow in reporting present conditions (especially with the recent dramatic revisions of past reports).

The US Federal Reserve went to a tightening status to combat inflation in April 2008 based off of this type of data (which was extremely late to the relatively obvious state of increased inflation). With an already low overnight bank rate, the Federal Reserve was forced to use up its most effective tool to stimulate the economy by taking it to 0% to .25% target. The Federal Reserve has also started to rapidly expand its balance sheet using “innovative” methods to promote lending. When considering debt and leverage, there really are limits to “innovation”; debt still needs to be repaid.

What happens if the home sales numbers start to show weakness again? What happens if (when) commercial real estate write offs start to replace the consumer debt write-offs on banks balance sheets. Do we have any other weapons to throw at the problem?

Unemployment is on the rise and Americans are more interested in saving money than spending right now. The US Government is trying to cure the problem by expanding lending while the US Citizen feels the solution to their problem is to reduce their debt. Interesting how the government and its people can be on such different pages.

Consumer spending makes up 70% of the United States GDP (I would argue that without the consumer we would not have the other 30%). The US Government and Wall Street have declared the worst is over. The average consumer does not feel the worst is over as seen in the retrenchment of retail sales, continued high savings rate and decreased consumer debt. What economic indicator should we believe?

The Wall Street Alchemist –Analysts

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

What job other than a Wall Street Analyst can you be wrong so often and still command such respect? Meteorologist?

Everyday new data is released to the market that can dramatically affect the market action for that day or even several days. This data alone would be less of an impact if where not for the analysts’ estimates that are either met, beaten or missed.


The market interoperates a miss as things are worse than expected. When the data beats the analysts numbers the market views things better than once thought. Lastly when the number is right on, we are status quo.

My question is how we can take the “educated guess” from a small group of people and determine whether the data released is positive, negative or status quo. Most analysts work for the investment community directly, so are their estimates driven by an agenda. These “educated guesses” somehow have become benchmarks. Lately these guesses have moved markets dramatically in short periods of time to the upside and downside.

Are these estimates for professional traders or investors? Should brokerage firms be able to release estimates, since they can have such an impact on the short term markets? Why do the markets seem to trade a step ahead of the news, is it because they set the benchmarks?