Posts Tagged ‘wall street’

The Glass is Half Full – A Dangerous Frame of Mind

Sunday, January 23rd, 2011

The financial press is bubbling with optimism. The road to recovery seems all but paved. We are bulletproof! Scary isn’t it, how after only a few years our financial community has forgotten the view from the edge of failure. What is even scarier than this bubble of optimism, is their dreams are resting on the exact same game plan that pushed the economy to the brink before.

Several years ago the real estate market collapsed and a large portion of American homeowners are underwater in their mortgages today because of it. When the crisis started most bad mortgages where held by private parties (investors) and insured by private organizations and known as sub prime. Just a few short years later FHA (Federal Housing Administration, insured by the US Government) mortgages are the new low and in some cases no money down solution. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (Who where taken over by the US Government in the beginning of the crisis) are buying most of mortgages banks are originating. So what was at one point a Wall Street problem seems to have become a taxpayer problem. Seems like the real estate problem was really just “solved” by the US government cosigning the kids’ debt on Wall Street.

The stock market has all but forgotten the crisis and has passed over the levels before it all began. According to the majority on Wall Street, the worst is over and the sky is the limit. Profits are on the rise. China and the other emerging nations will save us all as they move from export economies to import ones.

The US GDP (Gross Domestic Product) for 2010 was estimated to be about 14.6 trillion dollars; China’s 2010 GDP was estimated to be just over 6 trillion dollars. The dream of China saving the world seems as doomed as an 180lb man trying to save a drowning elephant.

The stock market has managed to recover past the pre crisis levels without much help from Main Street. Outflows on Mutual Funds have far exceeded inflows over the past few years. The stock market went from being populated with long-term investors to short term traders.

Current earnings carry less impact than future ones. When the financial press refers to a company’s price to earnings ratio, commonly they are referring to their future potential earnings. The current P/E’s (Price to earnings ratios) seem a little less spectacular and largely overlooked. If a meteorologist can’t predict the weather with much accuracy over 10 days, how can a company predict their earnings 365 days into the future? It’s like saying since it is sunny today it will be sunny next year on the same day.

Commodities prices have sky rocketed as a result of the government’s sure-fire cure of making the USA an export giant by devaluing the US Dollar. Gas is over $3.00 a gallon for most Americans and the cost at the grocery store is on the rise. Wall Street sees this rise in prices as validation of the ensuing recovery, while the rest of America finds less money in their pockets for the same amount of goods. 70% of the United State’s economy is based on Consumer spending, paying more for the same does not constitute growth in my book. Wait until manufacturers have to restock the shelves using record high basic materials. If the US Consumer can’t afford to go to the doctor and pay a co pay (as seen in a recent health insurance companies earnings helped by less people going to the doctor), I highly doubt these manufacturers will be able to pass on the higher costs. If the goods prices are firm and what the consumer is willing to pay is equally firm, than the only weak point is the manufacturer’s employee’s job.

One thing is for sure; nothing truly has changed for those who pushed the cart to the edge. The economic optimism is not based on fundamental changes to the system but rather the hope that the ship will right its self. Unfortunately most of us who live in the real world know that there is no such thing as a happy ending, if you pour water on a person who is drowning, it probably won’t help.

Sometimes it pays to look at the glass as half empty to ensure you conserve what is left.

Big Business in America Controlled by Wall Street – With your Money

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Public companies first and foremost have to answer to their shareholders. If public companies don’t, then their shareholders will abandon ship.

Many Americans primarily hold stock through Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds. This fact is proven by the percentage of ownership of companies by Institutional & Mutual Fund companies. Let’s take a look at the Dow Industrial 30 and their percentage of ownership by Institutional & Mutual Fund companies (as of 1/12/2010, information gathered from Yahoo Finance).

Company : % Owned by Institutional & Mutual Fund companies
3M : 68%
Alcoa : 68%
American Express : 80%
AT&T : 57%
Bank of America : 63%
Boeing : 60%
Caterpillar : 70%
Chevron : 63%
The Travelers Companies : 87%
DuPont : 65%
Exxon Mobil : 48%
GE : 50%
Cisco : 70%
Hewlett Packard Company : 77%
Intel : 65%
IBM : 61%
Johnson & Johnson : 65%
J.P. Morgan : 72%
Kraft : 57%
McDonalds : 71%
Merck : 80%
Microsoft : 63%
Pfizer : 59%
Wal-Mart : 37%
Disney : 67%

Out of the Dow 30 stocks only 2 (Exxon Mobil at 48% and Wal-Mart at 37%) have under 50% ownership Institutional & Mutual Fund companies. Over 93% of the Dow Industrial stocks have 50% or greater ownership by Institutional & Mutual Fund companies. Many of the Institutional & Mutual Fund company owners where the same for the Dow 30 stocks.

The above data shows that most individual investors have chosen to hold stock in the Dow Industrial 30 stock through Exchange Traded Funds and Mutual Funds. But who has the real shareholder control over these companies? Do you have shareholder voting rights as a fund holder with these stocks in it? The answer is no. The fund manager makes the decision for you, theoretically for the best interest of the fund holder. One thing is for sure, Wall Street hold the vote and therefore the control.

Wall Street nearly collapsed the US economy last year with their excessive risks. What type of risks are they forcing these companies to take?

The Straw that Could Break the Camel’s Back

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

The US Government and Wall Street have declared an end to the worst of this financial crisis that has plagued the world for so long. Is it really over, have we crossed the worst of it?

I am reminded of a common movie scene where the characters are climbing up a mountain to get to safety only to find a seemingly endless set of mountain ranges. The risk with declaring an end may be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. Can we take the double dip? What happens to the US consumer if there is another bout of mass layoffs.

There is no short of predictions for the future equally positive and negative. The current momentum seems to rest much of the world recovery on emerging markets and a weak dollar. Stimulus in the US has failed to create a meaningful impact on unemployment and the credit market has shrunk even with the massive bailouts last year. The US housing market has been kept on life support with government supported interest rates and tax rebates. My real concern is that nothing that has been done really is sustainable. Over the past year the US government has thrown money at everyone but its tax payers. Maybe the real solution is to let us spend our own money and when I say “us” I mean everyone regardless of income.

Interesting that Washington DC over the past years seems to have become just as disconnected to Main Street as Wall Street. Has Wall Street moved into Washington? Over the past year I have had discussions with many people who have lost their jobs or had a pay cuts, not one of them ever mentioned healthcare as a major problem right now.

Happy Thanksgiving! The Emerging Market of Dubai’s possible credit problems may give a new meaning to Black Friday or just another straw on the camel’s back.

Dow 15,000 = $10 Soda?

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

The Dow Industrial Average has rallied from 6,500 to just over 10,000 in a matter of months. Great news right? Maybe not if you consider at what expense, literally.

In my view the US economy is like a large aquarium. If you lean it in one direction the level may seem like it is going up on one side, but it is always at the expense of the other.

This stock market rally (Since March 2009) is undeniably at the expense of the US Dollar. Every time the dollar is weak the Dow is strong. This weakness in the dollar causes commodities to go up and US buying power to go down. So if the Dow manages to soar another 50%, don’t be surprised when your cost of living soars with it.

The famed “Dr. Doom” Nouriel Roubini has been expressing his concern over the “carry trade” where investors are borrowing dollars (shorting) and buying commodities. Many asset managers of recent have referred to the short dollar trade as “crowded”. This “rally” seems more like a another misuse of leverage. Looks like Wall Street gave up drinking by switching to beer.

Dow Industrial in red and US Dollar in green

Dow Industrial in red and US Dollar in green

Bank Stress Test – At Least 1 then, now 10 need Funds?

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

On Friday April 24th, 2009 the US Government released the parameters of their imposed stress test on the 19 largest banks in the USA. This release acknowledged that at least one of the banks involved in the test needed additional capital. On Tuesday May 5th 2009, information has leaked out that possibly 10 of the 19 banks will need additional funds.

The stress test results are scheduled to be released on Thursday May 7th, 2009. Since the release of the parameters on April 24th, information has been suspiciously disseminated seemly to soften the blow of the tests findings. So far from the information released, it appears over 50% of 19 largest banks in the USA need more money.


With still a couple days until the results are released, one has to consider if there will be more than 10. With the diminished political will towards Wall Street the obvious first step towards these banks raising the necessary capital will be to convert the US governments preferred shares (from TARP funds they received) to common equity. This conversion, which would alleviate debt from their balance sheets, would essentially put these banks one step towards nationalization.

Over two months ago the US Markets plunged to new lows on fears on banks being nationalized. Now it appears that the US government is inches from nationalization of some of the largest banks in the USA. If over 50% of the largest banks need money, what about the mid and small sized banks? Where will the funds come from?

Q1 Earnings Down 35% Year over Year – Bull Market?

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

With over 50% of companies earnings reported so far, earnings appear about 35% lower (of the S&P 500 included stocks) than last year’s same period. At the beginning of the year, analyst only expected 12.5% lower. Even with earnings so much lower than forecasted at the beginning of the year, expectations where reduced so dramatically over the quarter that that over two thirds of earnings have exceeded estimates so far.


Healthcare seems to have held off the impact of the recession with a 2.2% average growth over last year. Consumer discretionary companies have felt the most dramatic effect with an average earnings decline of 96.8% over last year. Interesting though how the Healthcare Sector Spider ETF (XLV) is down -8.66% this year and the Consumer Discretionary Sector Spider ETF (XLY) is up 5.27% for the year.

Although expectations where clearly lowered in the first quarter, the second quarter remains largely unchanged. Earnings are expected to be down 20% year over year in the second quarter and just a 4% drop in the third.

Wall Street seems to be either too pessimistic or overly optimistic. So the question is whether the future estimates are overly optimistic of too pessimistic? If Wall Street is ends up being too optimistic then we will likely retest the lows of early March 2009. If Wall Street turns out to be too pessimistic then we may have more to gain. The question is do you think earnings next quarter only declined 20% over last year’s same period?

Over Shooting Expectations

Friday, May 1st, 2009

In the first week of March 2009, the sentiment on Wall Street was very negative. Analysts started adjusting their earnings expectations down to match sentiment. By the end of the week the sellers were overtaken by buyers and now the stock market has moved over 20% in record time.

The general expectation was that the stock market would retrace some in April due to earnings season. So far nearly two thirds of earnings released have beaten expectations. Since expectations have been better than expected, the stock market has held up.


Sales and earnings for most of the companies who released are way off over last year. Companies who beat typically had their earnings expectations adjusted lower at one point during the first quarter.

When the market was heading into the abyss of 6500 on the Dow Industrial average, Wall Street lowered their expectations of the future. Expectations now are being raised since the market has made a record jump to speedy recovery.

Wall Street seems to always over shoot their expectations. When they are bearish, the worst is expected. When Wall Street is bullish, the best case is expected. Expectations are just that, what someone expects to happen.

The markets generally move on expectations. If expectations are high then the bear is advantaged. If expectations are low, then the bulls have the leg up. Can the lofty expectations being set now be achieved? Some of Wall Street is starting to forecast the conclusion to this financial crisis by summer’s end, what if it does not happen?

Consumer Confidence – Propaganda or Main Street Gauge?

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Every month the Conference Board releases the results of a poll conducted by TNS of 5000 US Households. This poll is meant to capture the mood of the average US household during the month in question and apply a number to it. If the mood of US households is improving then supposedly this is a sign of improved consumer spending and better conditions on Main Street.

The questions asked during this poll focus on both present conditions and future outlook. This sampling of US households is asked to give their current individual condition and forecast the US economy as it relates to them.


The most recent poll released on April 28, 2009 showed an increase in US Consumer Confidence from 26.0 to 39.2. In this most recent poll the Present Situation Index increased slightly from 21.9 to 23.7. The Expectations Index rose dramatically from 30.2 to 49.5. From this poll it clearly shows currently that expectations outweigh existing conditions. This sampling of US Households has increased its optimism for the future.

Over the past two months Washington and Wall Street have increased their confidence dramatically as well. Washington has made comments hinting that we have possibly seen the worst and Wall Street has rallied to lofty levels in record time.

Both Washington and Wall Street have made extra efforts to remain optimistic. Washington now takes great care in releasing information in not to disrupt the Markets too much. Wall Street seems to have teamed up to shift their majority view from bearish to bullish. In my opinion it also appears that the financial press seems to praise the bulls and shun the bears.

Propaganda is the dissemination of information that is meant to influence the opinions or behaviors of people. Wall Street and Washing are focusing on the glimmers of light at the end of the tunnel. The light could be real or it could be a train coming, but we are still for the most part in the dark.

Wall Street and Washington have something to gain by keeping the US household positive. Wall Street wants US Households to invest their hard earned money into the market so they can make money. Washington wants US households to feel they are succeeding in solving to problems so they can keep “political will” on their side and succeed in their political agenda.

Is Consumer Confidence a gauge of Main Street finances or a measure of success in political and corporate propaganda?

What Happens if the Economy Gets the Flu?

Monday, April 27th, 2009

Every couple of years the term “Flu Pandemic” makes headlines. The term refers to a global medical disaster where a large part of the world population gets the fast spreading flu. Every year the flu kills thousands; during a flu pandemic it could kill millions. A side effect of this type of crisis is felt in the world economies. Fear of illness keeps people in their homes and out of the malls. Sick people miss work that leads to less productivity.

Several agencies have done research for the USA into the potential economic impact of a flu pandemic. Their research has estimated that the US GDP could contract from 4% to 6% in a severe flu pandemic. They also estimated that if there is a mild flu pandemic it could shrink GDP by 1%. The report also noted that the effect in other countries could be much worse. The real impact is the loss of life the side effect is the contraction of economic growth. The report does indicate that economies should snap back after the crisis from pent up consumer demand.


A global flu pandemic would make a time of prosperity difficult let alone its effect during a time of crisis, as we are in right now. The economy is at such a fragile point that even a pandemic scare could have a measureable effect.

With Wall Street and Washington citing glimmers of hope, a flu pandemic, or even a scare, could sidetrack their hopes for the near future. At this point, the health of the people who make up the world economies should be the concern then worry about the economic side effects.

Earnings Expectations

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

So the long awaited earnings season is upon us and overall the market is holding up rather well. Earning either miss, meet or exceed expectations. Surprisingly many companies are exceeding expectations, even though the last quarter had been extremely challenging. But does missing, meeting or exceeding earnings expectation constitute good earnings?

On Thursday April 23rd, 2009 Microsoft released earnings that met expectations. Expectations were for 39 cents (excluding 6 cents in charges) a share which they met. Year over year earnings fell 32% from the same period last year. 60 days ago earnings estimates were for 40 cents a share.

On Thursday April 23rd, 2009 American Express released earning which exceeded expectations. Expectations were for 12 cents a share and they reported 31 cents a share. Year or year earnings fell 56% from the same period last year. 60 days ago earnings estimates were for 28 cents a share.


On Thursday April 23rd, 2009 Amgen reported earnings which missed expectations. Expectations were for $1.15 a share and they reported $1.08 a share. Year over year earnings fell 4% from the same period last year. 60 days ago earnings estimates were for $1.16 a share.

All three companies’ earnings are down year of year. The company who exceeded expectations actually saw the largest decrease in earnings year over year. The company who missed expectations saw the smallest decline in earnings year over year.

What are more important, expectations or actual earnings? Earnings are the product of companies; expectations are the product of Wall Street. In the above examples the expectations seemed to give the assumption that the company whose earnings are down the most year over year is doing better than the other two examples. What do you think?