Posts Tagged ‘tarp’

Wall Street Bonuses – Blind leading the Blind

Monday, January 11th, 2010

Main street America is bracing for the all expected news of coming bonuses for Wall Street executives. When main street is suffering with shrinking credit and high unemployment, why should the source of the problem get a bonuses. Well they made a lot of money over the past year, right? Most of these institutions paid off the TARP funds, so why should they not get bonuses?

First let’s look at how those institutions paid off their tarp funds. Goldman Sachs is believed to be at the apex of Wall Street with their proven track record. How did Goldman Sachs pay off their TARP debt so fast? Last year the US government bailed out AIG by giving them a large chunk of tax payer money. Most of those funds given to AIG passed directly through to institutions that they owed due to bad bets with credit default swaps. Goldman Sachs was the top recipient of $12.9 billion of those tax payer dollars. Goldman Sachs owed TARP $10 billion. Shouldn’t the house be responsible for the bets they take?

They made a lot of money, right? The question is at whose expense. These institutions make a good share of their profits off the consumer. Since credit card rates have gone up and the banks cost of money gone down (fed funds rate), it would seem some of the TARP funds where paid back by the same tax payer who bailed them out.

Who should decide whether these institutions give their executives bonuses? I personally believe that the shareholders should be making the decision, since they are the ones who own the company. Let’s take a look at Goldman Sachs’s top 10 institutional shareholders as of September 30th, 2009 considering 76% of Goldman Sachs is owned by Institutional & Mutual Fund Owners.

4.62% AXA – They provide insurance and asset management services through their subsidiaries around the world.
4.41% Barclay Group – They provide financial services to United States and Europe.
3.72% State Street Corporation – Provides financial services around the world.
3.40% Wellington Management Company – Institutional investment managers.
3.29% Vanguard Group – Provides mutual funds and other financial services.
3.20% FMR LLC – Otherwise known as Fidelity Investments is one of the largest mutual fund providers in the world.
2.14% Price (T. Rowe) Associates – Large mutual fund provider.
2.07% Marsico Capital Management – Financial services and mutual fund provider.
1.76% Janus Capital Management –Asset management and mutual fund provider.
1.70% J.P. Morgan and Company – Large financial services provider.

All of the above institutions have one thing in common and that is they are all investment managers. If you hold a mutual fund or ETF (exchange traded fund) that owns Goldman Sachs, do you vote as a shareholder? The answer is no, the fund manager makes the decision. Do you think the fund manager is going to say no to bonuses?

Whether Wall Street deserves the bonuses or not, one thing is for sure they will do what they want since there is no one to stop them.

Bank Stress Test – At Least 1 then, now 10 need Funds?

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

On Friday April 24th, 2009 the US Government released the parameters of their imposed stress test on the 19 largest banks in the USA. This release acknowledged that at least one of the banks involved in the test needed additional capital. On Tuesday May 5th 2009, information has leaked out that possibly 10 of the 19 banks will need additional funds.

The stress test results are scheduled to be released on Thursday May 7th, 2009. Since the release of the parameters on April 24th, information has been suspiciously disseminated seemly to soften the blow of the tests findings. So far from the information released, it appears over 50% of 19 largest banks in the USA need more money.


With still a couple days until the results are released, one has to consider if there will be more than 10. With the diminished political will towards Wall Street the obvious first step towards these banks raising the necessary capital will be to convert the US governments preferred shares (from TARP funds they received) to common equity. This conversion, which would alleviate debt from their balance sheets, would essentially put these banks one step towards nationalization.

Over two months ago the US Markets plunged to new lows on fears on banks being nationalized. Now it appears that the US government is inches from nationalization of some of the largest banks in the USA. If over 50% of the largest banks need money, what about the mid and small sized banks? Where will the funds come from?