Posts Tagged ‘mortgage’

Federal Reserve’s Scary Math

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

In the early 1980’s mortgage rates where above 14% and other debt carried an even higher rates of interest. During the early 1980’s, banks required most home buyers to put down 20% and have spotless credit. For example if a buyer purchased a home for $125,000 he or she would more than likely need to put $25,000 down (20%) and the monthly principle and interest payment at 14% would be $1184.87.

Over the past 25 plus years, rates on mortgages and most debt have fallen considerably. The cause of this decrease in rates is mostly attributed to the Federal Reserve’s action of lowering rates and raising rates to control inflation in the US economy. Clearly the Federal Reserve has viewed the past 2 plus decades as having relatively low inflation thereby lowing more than raising rates (Fed Funds Rate).

Lowering rates more than raising them creates cheaper costs of borrowing thereby making room for more. This cheap money also creates more of a demand for credit. This excessive credit demand led to fierce competition among banks. Competition is definitely a good thing until demand starts to wane. As soon as the credit demand let up this led to banks acting as their own Federal Reserves by creating products that artificially lowered the cost of lending thereby stimulating borrowing.

Most home buyers view a home purchase not by the sales price, but by the down payment and monthly obligation. Now let’s look at the buyer from the early 1980’s with he or she’s $25,000 to put down and the ability to afford $1184.87 monthly payment. This buyer today could afford a $225,000 home with $25,000 down with $1183.08 monthly principle and interest payment with an interest rate of 5.875% and relaxed down payment restrictions. Identical down payments and same monthly, but twice the debt, was the growth in value or debt?

This rather rapid reduction in the cost of money over the past two plus decades has led to an equal increase in the price of cars, education, utilities, etc. Inflation seems to have been masked in credit. The credit markets in the US and around the world nearly collapsed because they had “maxed out their credit”. With the rapid expansion of debt at the end of the road with the Fed Funds rate at 0 to .25% target and lending rates increasing because of diminishing credit quality (except for mortgages because the Federal Reserve is supporting the rates), what’s next? Deflation?

Innovation in Banking

Friday, April 24th, 2009

While the real estate market was roaring, banks where feverishly competing to provide mortgages to the anxious American homebuyer. During the peak of bubble new “innovative” products were released regularly requiring less information from buyers and or more payment flexibility. Institutions that did not offer these “innovative” products fell quickly behind their competitors who did.

In every industry leaders are chased by lagers. In a top 10 list of an industry, 2 through 10 are always trying to take number ones spot. This competitiveness is what typically spurs “innovation” in an industry.

Banking is one business where “innovation” is more difficult to develop. Banks can and do develop”innovative” ways to service their customers more conveniently and efficiently without increasing risk. When banks develop “innovative” lending or insurance products, it is typically at the expense of increased risk.

Risk in banking during good times typically leads to increased profits. So during the good times typically banks look to increased product risk makes you more competitive. When times are tough, risk typically leads to losses. Then during bad times you could say reduced product risk typically makes you more competitive.

Innovation in banking is now more focused on reducing risk, since this improves their competitiveness during tough times. They are doing this by increasing lending requirements and raising fees. The US government has also attempted to reduce banks risk by artificially suppressing rates to keep the cost of lending down, therefore improving profit margins for banks.

Banks “innovation” on increased risk nearly put them out of business. Will their “innovation” on reducing risk finish them off?

Positive Housing Numbers! Are they?

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

So over the past few weeks lagging housing data has shown some signs of hope. We have seen an improvement in existing home sales, new home sales and pending home sales. Mortgage rates are at an all time low and mortgage applications are on the rise.


So what does this data mean in respect to the ailing housing market? Well really in the context of actual numbers, these improvements are relatively small and in a typical market time uneventful. Some see these improvements as a possible bottom forming in the housing market (sound familiar, November 2008 stock market). Others see this as a possible “dead cat bounce” in the real estate market. A “dead cat bounce” refers to a small improvement before continuing down.

Real Estate values are still declining according to the S&P Case Shiller index data released March 31rst, 2009 which showed that average housing prices are back to 2003 levels. Also more than half of sales are distressed. The increase in sales is definitely positive, but many of these sales are speculative which does not help the stabilization of pricing. Just like in the stock market, you need individuals buying with the intention of staying (no flipping) to stabilize prices.

Unemployment is on the rise and the world economies are continuing to weaken, which will add to large company layoffs especially if they rely heavily on overseas revenue. High unemployment does not help the housing.

Mortgage rates are being artificially suppressed by the US government, what happens when they stop supporting them? What should mortgage rates really be? Rates are at extreme lows, shouldn’t sales reflect this extreme a little more to the upside. If we do slide into a deflation spiral, then real estate prices will most likely fall more which would wipe away the benefit of the lower rates.

Real Estate was bought and sold like stocks over the past 8 year, so more than likely it will correct the same way. It is typically not a good idea to try to catch a falling knife, but if you are buying and selling into this market at the same time, then I guess it would be a wash.