Posts Tagged ‘depression’

Is Deflation the Problem or the Solution?

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

Over the past year the US government has taken large steps to ward off the destructive forces of deflation. Deflation takes much of the blame for the financial crisis during the depression of the 1930’s.

Instead of following in the monetary footsteps of the Federal Reserve during the depression, the current US Federal Reserve is attempting to monetize their way out of the problem by flooding the system with money.

One thing is for sure, the Federal Reserve of the 1930’s was successful in the long run. The United States emerged as the power house economy of the world. During the 1930’s prices came down and leverage was reduced through the process of deflation.

The current policy of the United States is to attempt to re inflate the US economy at all costs. This policy reflects a belief that deflation is worse than inflation. The Federal Reserve believes that they can control inflation through the control of the overnight bank rate.

If they can control inflation, than why has debt grown significantly (historically) faster than income over the last 30 years? Stable growth, in my opinion, should be complimented by salary growth and not expanded credit. Unfortunately complex financial instruments have fooled our Federal Reserve into believing we have had very tame inflation over the past 30 years. How do you bring debt back into balance with income? Deflation?

Couple relevant quotes:

“I place economy among the first and most important of republican virtues, and debt as the greatest of the dangers to be feared.” -Thomas Jefferson -1816

“I have sufficiently urged that all suggestions as to financial innovation be regarded with extreme skepticism” John Kenneth Galbraith from “A Short History of Financial Euphoria

Contrarian to Mainstream in Weeks – Stock Market

Friday, March 27th, 2009

Several weeks ago when the US Stock market was selling off with no bottom in sight we heard much of the financial populous using the term “capitulation”. Capitulation is defined by Webster’s dictionary as “surrendering or giving up”, traders characterize it as panic selling typically accompanied by large volume. Many professionals look at capitulation as a way to capitalize on another’s emotional bad decision. If the masses, “mob”, sells out then the market would have nowhere to go but up because all the sellers are gone. The theory is that it pays to contrarian.


Interesting how we really never did get this day of reckoning or “capitulation”. Instead a steady flow of relatively good news has spurred the major average up near 20% in a matter of weeks. With several weeks on a roll we have heard (not from all, but a large majority) from public officials, investment professionals and financial press that we may have seen the worst of this economic crisis.

If it pays to be contrarian then don’t you lose if you are part of the mainstream? Could the market be doing the same as capitulation but on the upside, panic buying for their jobs? Remember Wall Street suffers long term in a bear market.

President Herbert Hoover (31rst President of USA 1929-1933) on May 1, 1930 stated that United States was not through all its difficulties but he believed that United States had been through the worst (taken from The World in Depression 1929-1939 by Charles P. Kindleberger)

hoover-comment-dow

Red Circle Indicates End of April Beginning May 1930 Dow Industrial Average


What Caused this Economic Mess?

Friday, March 20th, 2009

Well, like the Great Depression it will be debated for years to come and will still come down to theories. Well here is my theory.

I believe that the cause to this terrible economic world disaster is simply RISK. If you look at the following chart of the Dow Industrials from 1928 to 2009 you will recognize the last 30 years seems to be an anomaly.

Dow Industrial Average from 1928 to 2009

Dow Industrial Average from 1928 to 2009

When an index like the Dow Industrials grows to levels like it has over the past thirty years fundamentals can only explain so much. Money is what makes a market climb like it has over the past 3 decades. Simply the more people investing in stock makes the market grow. So basically a generation decided that they were going to accept more risk than their parents did. Their parents had kept the market at bay, since they did live through the Great Depression and understand what can happen when you accept too much risk.

If you look at the last generation who lived through the Great Depression their retirement from the workforce coincidently coincides with the beginning of this current run up in the market. In the early 1980’s the USA had a savings rate of nearly 10%, in 2006 we were at a negative savings rate (spending more than we made). Over the past 30 years we have accepted more and more risk into our lives and now are dealing with the rebalancing in my opinion. We tend to forget if we do not have someone continuously reminding us.