Archive for the ‘Stock Market Actions’ Category

Earnings Expectations

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

So the long awaited earnings season is upon us and overall the market is holding up rather well. Earning either miss, meet or exceed expectations. Surprisingly many companies are exceeding expectations, even though the last quarter had been extremely challenging. But does missing, meeting or exceeding earnings expectation constitute good earnings?

On Thursday April 23rd, 2009 Microsoft released earnings that met expectations. Expectations were for 39 cents (excluding 6 cents in charges) a share which they met. Year over year earnings fell 32% from the same period last year. 60 days ago earnings estimates were for 40 cents a share.

On Thursday April 23rd, 2009 American Express released earning which exceeded expectations. Expectations were for 12 cents a share and they reported 31 cents a share. Year or year earnings fell 56% from the same period last year. 60 days ago earnings estimates were for 28 cents a share.


On Thursday April 23rd, 2009 Amgen reported earnings which missed expectations. Expectations were for $1.15 a share and they reported $1.08 a share. Year over year earnings fell 4% from the same period last year. 60 days ago earnings estimates were for $1.16 a share.

All three companies’ earnings are down year of year. The company who exceeded expectations actually saw the largest decrease in earnings year over year. The company who missed expectations saw the smallest decline in earnings year over year.

What are more important, expectations or actual earnings? Earnings are the product of companies; expectations are the product of Wall Street. In the above examples the expectations seemed to give the assumption that the company whose earnings are down the most year over year is doing better than the other two examples. What do you think?

When being Positive can be Dangerous

Saturday, April 25th, 2009

The mood on Wall Street and in Washington went from a very negative outlook to a relatively positive one in a matter of months. Whether they are trying to stay upbeat or believe that the economy has made a turn, the dangers of being positive might outweigh the benefits.

When President Obama took office nearly every speech he or one of his appointees (Treasury Secretary) made was followed by a negative day on Wall Street. Outlook was grim and reality was settling in with Americans. Now the exact opposite is true, speeches appear to be carefully calculated and responses on Wall Street are more positive.

Wall Street for the most part believes the “bottom” is in. Washington believes the worst is over but we could still have some tough times ahead.

Most of the economic data that spurred the month and a half record breaking rally has started to retrench (retail sales and existing home sale). There are still more down economic data months than up which points to a negative trend.

Wall Street points out to investors that the market historically rallies over 50% after a large correction “bottoms”. The Dow Industrial average touched 6440 in February 2009, if it were to rally 50% then the Dow would be 9660. The Dow Industrial Average was closed at 9034 on January 2, 2009. This “rebound” would leave the Dow Industrial up 6.9% from the beginning of the year.

If the economic data continues to slide and the Market starts another correction, what percentage does it historically go down? It seems mostly the positive view is more statistically backed than the negative view. Being negative could save you money while the positive could make you money, what can you afford?

We are taught it is better to think of the glass as half full; but when you only have half left being negative may be the only way to keep it half full.

Innovation in Banking

Friday, April 24th, 2009

While the real estate market was roaring, banks where feverishly competing to provide mortgages to the anxious American homebuyer. During the peak of bubble new “innovative” products were released regularly requiring less information from buyers and or more payment flexibility. Institutions that did not offer these “innovative” products fell quickly behind their competitors who did.

In every industry leaders are chased by lagers. In a top 10 list of an industry, 2 through 10 are always trying to take number ones spot. This competitiveness is what typically spurs “innovation” in an industry.

Banking is one business where “innovation” is more difficult to develop. Banks can and do develop”innovative” ways to service their customers more conveniently and efficiently without increasing risk. When banks develop “innovative” lending or insurance products, it is typically at the expense of increased risk.

Risk in banking during good times typically leads to increased profits. So during the good times typically banks look to increased product risk makes you more competitive. When times are tough, risk typically leads to losses. Then during bad times you could say reduced product risk typically makes you more competitive.

Innovation in banking is now more focused on reducing risk, since this improves their competitiveness during tough times. They are doing this by increasing lending requirements and raising fees. The US government has also attempted to reduce banks risk by artificially suppressing rates to keep the cost of lending down, therefore improving profit margins for banks.

Banks “innovation” on increased risk nearly put them out of business. Will their “innovation” on reducing risk finish them off?

A Good Leading Indicator – Oil

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

Crude oil prices over the past few months have show strong resilience to the ever building inventories. Week after week crude oil inventories have built to now a 19 year high reserve in the USA. The stock market seems to be speculating a relatively strong recovery and it seems like oil is attempting to price in the same by shrugging off the overall bearish reports.

Since the stock markets appear to be more speculative than realistic these days, crude oil supplies look to be a better indicator to economic activity in the United States. As the old saying goes “America runs on oil”, so it stands to say that if oil demand is retrenching than probably US production is doing the same.

Here is a chart of crude inventory supplies in the USA:

crude-oil-inventories-4-22-09

Crude oil supplies have continued to build at a relatively quick pace since October 2008. You will also notice that crude oil supplies broke above the June 2007 highs in February 2009 after a brief stabilization of the inventories in January till mid February.

The stock market started its most dramatic decent in October 2008. The stock market over the past month and a half has been rallying off data showing stabilization in the economy from January and February.

Every week a report is released by the Energy Information Administration tracking crude inventory supplies in the United States. Because oil is measured by barrel, coming up with this report is not open to interpretation or future adjustments.

If you believe America truly does run on oil, then this should be a good leading indicator to how fast America really is running.

Snow Ball Effect

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

Last week the CEO of NYSE Euronext, Duncan Niederauer, told CNBC that the rally over the last month and a half was not spurred by Investors, but by traders. In the interview he cites the rather low volume considering the movement and that the investor still lacks confidence to venture back into the markets. (Read the Article here)

The rally over the past month and a half is the largest move up in a short period of time since the 1930’s. Without “Investors” buying stocks this might end up being the largest bear market rally on record. The market needs investors to buy and hold stocks to build on this already remarkable short term bull move.

Wall Street has burned bridges before and was able to regain the trust of investors rather quickly in the past. Wall Street needs a bull market to survive so obviously they will rally the glimmers of hope while discounting the vast darkness as “already baked in”. Will Investors buy into Wall Street’s “snow ball effect” attempt or have they finally crossed the line?

Wall Street has led you to believe that the market leads the economy by about 6 months. Wall Street leading the market assumes that the Investor will follow. Recent polls have shown that the majority of Americans do not currently trust Wall Street. Investors have already lost so much over the past year, have they had enough? Americans are spending less and saving more. Will they sacrifice more so they can risk more?

Turning Ordinary Metal into Gold – The Modern Day Alchemists on Wall Street

Monday, April 20th, 2009

File:HermesTrismegistusCauc.jpgHundreds of years ago Kings and Queens where captivated by Alchemists who claimed to be able to turn ordinary metal into gold. Alchemist preyed on the wealthy to pay for their lifestyle and experimentation into this so called science of the time. By all accounts some alchemists where true believers, but more were just looking to dupe the wealthy out of their riches.

Today most of us view Alchemy as ridiculous and wonder how so many people in such great power could believe in it. Although today most of us think that the so called science of Alchemy is ludicrous, for some reason we still seem to believe that it is possible to turn ordinary metal into gold, figuratively.

This association was never more obvious than during the technology bubble 10 years ago. A person or group with just an idea was able to solicit millions from investors, before there was even a product. Most of Wall Street made speculations of wealth on the notion of near limitless growth which we now view as absurd. Even after those failed speculations we continue to put faith in Wall Street.

Looking at today it is understandable how the practice of Alchemy had captured the minds of yesterday for so long. As yesterday, on Wall Street there seems to be true believers and frauds (i.e. Bernie Madoff) in the art of turning ordinary metal into gold.

I do not believe all investment advice is the practice of alchemy. I will say though that the use of speculation in investment advice does seem to prey on mans’ fascination of turning ordinary metal into gold.

The mystery and lure of Alchemy was spread by stories from witnesses to this incredible act of turning ordinary metal into gold. It was not until the late 1700’s that this art of deception was revealed. A book was published on how these alchemists deceived witnesses. How many stories have you heard of someone who invested in a stock that made them extremely wealthy (i.e. Microsoft)?

Banks Profitable – That was Easy

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

Okay so here we are again, it is earning season and to the market’s surprise banks are showing some profits. When I make the above statement I can’t help to picture a older man in a suit riding a bike with training wheels saying “Mom look, I can ride a bike”.


All it took was nearly a trillion dollars to suppress mortgage rates; billions of dollars of direct aid, small change to Market to Market accounting and a commitment from the US government indicating they will not them fail.

Meanwhile earnings of companies who do not have the favor of the government are falling rapidly. Housing starts again appear to be retrenching (remember this was a pillar which Wall Street put such angst on citing recovery). A large commercial real estate firm (holds over 200 malls across America) filed for bankruptcy protection today with a disclosed $29.6 billion in assets and $27 billion in liabilities. What banks are on the hook for that?

The US economy cycles through expansion and contraction of credit. This process has occurred for centuries. Since the Federal Reserve started to maintain control of the overnight bank rate the cycles have become somewhat more predictable. This predictability occurs because as the Federal Reserve identifies where the US economy is in a cycle it responds with a rather predictable action. This action has a somewhat predictable response.

When the economy approaches over expansion of credit the Federal Reserve raises the overnight bank rate to raise the cost of lending, which theoretically should slow growth. When the economy starts to contract credit, the Federal Reserve lowers the overnight bank rate to lower the cost of lending, which theoretically should spur growth.

The actions to save banks over the past year are meant to contribute to the above mentioned goal. The US Government and Federal Reserve are attempting to reduce the cost of lending to spur growth. The dilemma that is facing the United States is that currently its citizens are contracting out of fear. The average US citizens’ mindset has changed from over consumption to conservation. Since US consumers makes up about 70% of GDP, growth cannot occur without them.

To stabilize the US consumer you most likely need to improve unemployment to reduce this fear. This week showed an improvement in claims (attributed to the holiday week) but continued claims are still rising (over 6 million). This indicates that finding a job is still a challenge. For job growth to resume, someone needs to start hiring. The US government is attempting to take this role artificially with their behemoth stimulus they passed.

It appears the US government is attempting to put training wheels on its economy by trying to shoulder the weight on their own. These banks that have already had the training wheels attached are profitable off the actions of the US government, at the expense of the US taxpayer. I was under the impression that companies went out of business because not enough business to support them. What happens when (if?) the US government takes off the training wheels? Will the economy ride on its own or break a leg?

A Real Economic Indicator

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Yesterday consumer spending started back down the path of contraction. Remember one of the major sparks for the March rally was the improved retail sales numbers. It is funny how a once very pessimistic market can turn overly optimistic in such a short period of time.


Wall Street and the US government rely heavily this economic data for their analysis of the economy and its current state. Interesting how this data did not reveal the current state of the economy sooner. A year ago very few could have predicted the current crisis and its depth. It would seem that this method of data collection is too slow in reporting present conditions (especially with the recent dramatic revisions of past reports).

The US Federal Reserve went to a tightening status to combat inflation in April 2008 based off of this type of data (which was extremely late to the relatively obvious state of increased inflation). With an already low overnight bank rate, the Federal Reserve was forced to use up its most effective tool to stimulate the economy by taking it to 0% to .25% target. The Federal Reserve has also started to rapidly expand its balance sheet using “innovative” methods to promote lending. When considering debt and leverage, there really are limits to “innovation”; debt still needs to be repaid.

What happens if the home sales numbers start to show weakness again? What happens if (when) commercial real estate write offs start to replace the consumer debt write-offs on banks balance sheets. Do we have any other weapons to throw at the problem?

Unemployment is on the rise and Americans are more interested in saving money than spending right now. The US Government is trying to cure the problem by expanding lending while the US Citizen feels the solution to their problem is to reduce their debt. Interesting how the government and its people can be on such different pages.

Consumer spending makes up 70% of the United States GDP (I would argue that without the consumer we would not have the other 30%). The US Government and Wall Street have declared the worst is over. The average consumer does not feel the worst is over as seen in the retrenchment of retail sales, continued high savings rate and decreased consumer debt. What economic indicator should we believe?

The Fortune Telling Stock Market

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

The stock market is typically 5 or 6 months ahead of the economy. That is what we are led to believe; actually many bear market rallies are predicated on this theory. Does it really?

We heard the declared bottom ring in November 2008 when the Dow Industrial Average hit 7552. So according to the Stock Market fortune teller the Dow Industrial Average should not have broken the 7552 level in February and economy should be on the rise by now. Unfortunately this prediction has been proved wrong this time.

One thing is for sure; eventually it will be right (assuming you believe the World’s economies will recover at one point, I do). One of the eventual lows will be preceded by growth.

Sounds kind of like a convenient statistic, where they fail to disclose the accuracy. Over the past year, how many times have you heard “bottom”, how many times has this fortune telling ability been right?

Lately the fortune telling ability of the stock market has been the reason “you can’t afford not to be in this market” according to the mass populous on Wall Street. It may eventually be true, but can you afford its accuracy?

Is This More of the Same – Speculation

Monday, April 6th, 2009

The stock market over the past month has gained over 20% on most the major averages. Matter of fact almost everything has been going up, even oil, which still is showing a dramatic reduction in demand on a weekly basis. This feverish buying has been on the heels of some financial data that has marked an improvement from analysts’ estimates.


These economic improvements have been touted by Wall Street as the beginning of the long awaited recovery. According to much of Wall Street the worst is over and the “bottom” is in. There is a population of Wall Street who feel that we have not seen the worst, but interestingly the bulls hog the air time with the financial press. (see Contrarian to Mainstream in Weeks – Stock Market for more insight)

Let’s take a look at some of this improved data:

Retail Sales:

Retail Sales

Retail Sales

Existing Home Sales:

Exisiting Home Sales

Exisiting Home Sales

Durable Goods Orders:

Durable Goods Orders

Durable Goods Orders

The above numbers helped launch the stock market averages to achieve historical gains in a short period of time. Does one month constitute a so called bottom? The data improvement was really in the month to month change. Year over year the data is still quit grim. If this is recovery then these numbers should not look back. What happens if they start to decline again? Where is the growth coming from? Has anything really changed over the past month or two?

Here is a piece of data that did not affect the market the way it probably should have:

Unemployment Rate:

Unemployment Rate:

Unemployment Rate:

Personally I feel that the “bottom” will be reached when everyone gives up on calling the bottom.