Archive for the ‘Commodities’ Category

The Glass is Half Full – A Dangerous Frame of Mind

Sunday, January 23rd, 2011

The financial press is bubbling with optimism. The road to recovery seems all but paved. We are bulletproof! Scary isn’t it, how after only a few years our financial community has forgotten the view from the edge of failure. What is even scarier than this bubble of optimism, is their dreams are resting on the exact same game plan that pushed the economy to the brink before.

Several years ago the real estate market collapsed and a large portion of American homeowners are underwater in their mortgages today because of it. When the crisis started most bad mortgages where held by private parties (investors) and insured by private organizations and known as sub prime. Just a few short years later FHA (Federal Housing Administration, insured by the US Government) mortgages are the new low and in some cases no money down solution. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (Who where taken over by the US Government in the beginning of the crisis) are buying most of mortgages banks are originating. So what was at one point a Wall Street problem seems to have become a taxpayer problem. Seems like the real estate problem was really just “solved” by the US government cosigning the kids’ debt on Wall Street.

The stock market has all but forgotten the crisis and has passed over the levels before it all began. According to the majority on Wall Street, the worst is over and the sky is the limit. Profits are on the rise. China and the other emerging nations will save us all as they move from export economies to import ones.

The US GDP (Gross Domestic Product) for 2010 was estimated to be about 14.6 trillion dollars; China’s 2010 GDP was estimated to be just over 6 trillion dollars. The dream of China saving the world seems as doomed as an 180lb man trying to save a drowning elephant.

The stock market has managed to recover past the pre crisis levels without much help from Main Street. Outflows on Mutual Funds have far exceeded inflows over the past few years. The stock market went from being populated with long-term investors to short term traders.

Current earnings carry less impact than future ones. When the financial press refers to a company’s price to earnings ratio, commonly they are referring to their future potential earnings. The current P/E’s (Price to earnings ratios) seem a little less spectacular and largely overlooked. If a meteorologist can’t predict the weather with much accuracy over 10 days, how can a company predict their earnings 365 days into the future? It’s like saying since it is sunny today it will be sunny next year on the same day.

Commodities prices have sky rocketed as a result of the government’s sure-fire cure of making the USA an export giant by devaluing the US Dollar. Gas is over $3.00 a gallon for most Americans and the cost at the grocery store is on the rise. Wall Street sees this rise in prices as validation of the ensuing recovery, while the rest of America finds less money in their pockets for the same amount of goods. 70% of the United State’s economy is based on Consumer spending, paying more for the same does not constitute growth in my book. Wait until manufacturers have to restock the shelves using record high basic materials. If the US Consumer can’t afford to go to the doctor and pay a co pay (as seen in a recent health insurance companies earnings helped by less people going to the doctor), I highly doubt these manufacturers will be able to pass on the higher costs. If the goods prices are firm and what the consumer is willing to pay is equally firm, than the only weak point is the manufacturer’s employee’s job.

One thing is for sure; nothing truly has changed for those who pushed the cart to the edge. The economic optimism is not based on fundamental changes to the system but rather the hope that the ship will right its self. Unfortunately most of us who live in the real world know that there is no such thing as a happy ending, if you pour water on a person who is drowning, it probably won’t help.

Sometimes it pays to look at the glass as half empty to ensure you conserve what is left.

What a Tangled Web We Have Woven – Inverse Dollar Market Relationship

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Simply put, the US economic recovery will be short lived if it depends on the dollar going to zero. By design the current US political powers wanted exactly what is happening, weak dollar improves exports and large companies overseas earnings. Unfortunately this prescription for recovery reduces the buying power of the largest consumer in the world, the USA.

This plan for recovery unfortunately seems to leave out one all important component, the US Citizen. Wall Street is getting back to their country clubs at the expense of the 10.2 % unemployed (and growing) by shorting the US Dollar and crowding the commodities trade. Remember last year when the political powers vilified investors who shorted bank stocks, well isn’t shorting the Dollar kind of un-American. What percentage of those banks bailed out where owned by foreign investors.

Over the recent quarter large companies have credited a large portion of their recovery to overseas sales. McDonalds over the past week announced sales for last month showing that US sales were down, but overseas sales were up. If you are a US Citizen you may or may not have money invested in the stock market, but you definitely have Dollars.

One thing is for sure, if you are an American, this recovery is hurting you.

Cheeseburger Futures, Options Maybe ETFs?

Friday, October 30th, 2009

We have gasoline futures, why not cheeseburger futures. Traders could speculate on the demand for cheeseburgers seasonally and cyclically. A lot of traders eat cheeseburgers and are amateur cheeseburger producers. This experience would give them great insight into the supply and demand of cheeseburgers around the world.

Trading cheeseburger futures could stabilize earnings of fast food giants. Fast food giants could save on innovation in the production of cheeseburgers because when prices are high their no need to change a good thing. When prices are low they could just stop producing as many cheeseburgers thereby reducing the supply and supporting the futures price, even though demand is falling. Maybe we should also have pizza futures or even ice cream futures.

I hope you could smell the sarcasm. Just my perception on how ludicrous it is to have gasoline futures.

A Good Leading Indicator – Oil

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

Crude oil prices over the past few months have show strong resilience to the ever building inventories. Week after week crude oil inventories have built to now a 19 year high reserve in the USA. The stock market seems to be speculating a relatively strong recovery and it seems like oil is attempting to price in the same by shrugging off the overall bearish reports.

Since the stock markets appear to be more speculative than realistic these days, crude oil supplies look to be a better indicator to economic activity in the United States. As the old saying goes “America runs on oil”, so it stands to say that if oil demand is retrenching than probably US production is doing the same.

Here is a chart of crude inventory supplies in the USA:

crude-oil-inventories-4-22-09

Crude oil supplies have continued to build at a relatively quick pace since October 2008. You will also notice that crude oil supplies broke above the June 2007 highs in February 2009 after a brief stabilization of the inventories in January till mid February.

The stock market started its most dramatic decent in October 2008. The stock market over the past month and a half has been rallying off data showing stabilization in the economy from January and February.

Every week a report is released by the Energy Information Administration tracking crude inventory supplies in the United States. Because oil is measured by barrel, coming up with this report is not open to interpretation or future adjustments.

If you believe America truly does run on oil, then this should be a good leading indicator to how fast America really is running.

Will Oil go to $100 or $10 a Barrel?

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

Many Energy analysts feel once the world’s economies start to grow again we could see over $100 a barrel of crude again. Their basis for this conclusion is that with oil down near $100 a barrel from its high (and falling), companies and countries will slow or stop their exploration for oil. Less exploration means we will have eventually have a supply shortage. (see Re-flation Trade! Really? for more insight)


This theory is correct, but I believe the timing is too aggressive. There is another theory that does not get as much airtime as the above mentioned which explains how increased commodities prices typically brings increased supply. Basically as commodity prices rise, countries and companies ramp up exploration and extraction of the commodity to cash in on the increased prices. Also with increased prices technology improves and extraction becomes more efficient.

This increase in supply typically overshoots demand. The question is, how long will this process take? The last commodities bubble that popped took place in the early 1980’s. How much supply is really out there? The world for the most part is contracting. The process of rebalancing the supply and demand curve of oil could take some time.

The real threat to this process, in my opinion, is the artificial supply control of OPEC. They have never been successful in their efforts for the long term because their success solely depends on the cooperation of the countries that make up OPEC. If a large percentage of your GDP comes from the sale of oil and your nation is starting to starve because demand has fallen off a cliff, do you sell what you have or hold onto it with hopes that oil prices will be higher tomorrow? I think the answer to that question is, depends on how much cash reserves you have.

Supply and Demand is what sets prices, everything else is just manipulation. Manipulation can only exist in the short term; eventually reality catches up and typically overshoots in the other direction.