Archive for May, 2009

Federal Reserve Statement

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

Judge for yourself, but it looks like according to the US Federal Reserve the outlook has not improved. The economy has continued to “contract” and their hope is resting on the stimulus and the Federal Reserve’s steps it has already taken. They cite household spending has seen signs of stabilizing, “but” with continued job loss, declining housing wealth and tight credit, it still is “constrained. There has never been a time in history where fighting a credit crisis with credit has ever won. Maybe it isn’t a lack of credit, but too much credit in the system.

Here is a copy of their statement released today at 2:00 PM EST:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in March indicates that the economy has continued to contract, though the pace of contraction appears to be somewhat slower. Household spending has shown signs of stabilizing but remains constrained by ongoing job losses, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Weak sales prospects and difficulties in obtaining credit have led businesses to cut back on inventories, fixed investment, and staffing. Although the economic outlook has improved modestly since the March meeting, partly reflecting some easing of financial market conditions, economic activity is likely to remain weak for a time. Nonetheless, the Committee continues to anticipate that policy actions to stabilize financial markets and institutions, fiscal and monetary stimulus, and market forces will contribute to a gradual resumption of sustainable economic growth in a context of price stability.

In light of increasing economic slack here and abroad, the Committee expects that inflation will remain subdued. Moreover, the Committee sees some risk that inflation could persist for a time below rates that best foster economic growth and price stability in the longer term.

In these circumstances, the Federal Reserve will employ all available tools to promote economic recovery and to preserve price stability. The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and anticipates that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period. As previously announced, to provide support to mortgage lending and housing markets and to improve overall conditions in private credit markets, the Federal Reserve will purchase a total of up to $1.25 trillion of agency mortgage-backed securities and up to $200 billion of agency debt by the end of the year. In addition, the Federal Reserve will buy up to $300 billion of Treasury securities by autumn. The Committee will continue to evaluate the timing and overall amounts of its purchases of securities in light of the evolving economic outlook and conditions in financial markets. The Federal Reserve is facilitating the extension of credit to households and businesses and supporting the functioning of financial markets through a range of liquidity programs. The Committee will continue to carefully monitor the size and composition of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet in light of financial and economic developments.

Expectations Indicator – Updated 5/13/09

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

The theory behind the Expectations Indicator is that it is easier to exceed low expectations than high ones. For more information on the Expectations Indicator click here.

The Expectations Indicator report will be released in the following format till we decide to change it.

High Expectations – Listed by Highest to least highest expectations

1. Energy, Basic Materials, Consumer Services and Technology are tied
2. Utilities and Telecommunication

Low Expectations – Listed by Lowest to highest lowest expectations

1. Financials
2. Industrials

The following had no change in Expectations; Healthcare and Consumer Goods

Overall the market has relatively High Expectations.

Since the Expectations Indicator concept is new, only time will prove this it useful or useless. This indicator will continue to be released until proven not useful. The indicator is for information purposes only and is not meant to constitute any type of financial advice. We also do not guarantee the accuracy of the above information and at any point may alter, change the process of producing it and or discontinue it.

Too Big to Fail – A Concept that has gone into Bankruptcy

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

Bankruptcy is a legally declared inability or impairment of ability of an individual or organization to pay its creditors. Since the beginning of the current financial crisis thousands of businesses and individuals have filed bankruptcy in America. Most of America has no protection from bankruptcy. The US government has invented a term “too big to fail” which seems to have immunized the nation’s largest businesses from bankruptcy.

Companies that have been labeled “too big to fail” directly and indirectly (suppliers) employ millions of people. Over the past year the Government contributed billions of US tax payer money to these behemoth companies to prevent them from meeting a self inflicted fate.

The recent optimism over banks seems somewhat over exaggerated considering we have already given hundreds of billions of dollars to these banks and they need 75 billion more. The treasury secretary has been quoted that he believes the banks can “earn their way out” of this crisis. Tax payer allowed these once doomed banks to raise their profit margins so they can “earn their way out” of the hole they dug themselves into (i.e. questionable credit card practices that has taken recent political stage).

The US auto industry has been dying slowly for decades. Two out of the three US auto manufacturers were pulled from the thaws bankruptcy late last year. Now one of them has already entered bankruptcy and the other is all but guaranteed to file. So this intervention by the US government just ended up being a waste of taxpayer money.

Bankruptcy is a clear case that capitalism is successful. It is Business’s form of natural selection. A business goes bankrupt when supply exceeds demand and or new innovation trumps the old. Bankruptcy makes room for new businesses that are better suited for the times. Since bankruptcy is such an integral part of capitalism and the evolution of business, what happens when you manipulate natural selection?

Expectations Indicator – Updated 5/10/09

Monday, May 11th, 2009

The theory behind the Expectations Indicator is that it is easier to exceed low expectations than high ones. For more information on the Expectations Indicator click here.

Expectations Indicator for Week of May 10th, 2009
Sector / Index5/6/20095/10/2009
EnergyLow ExpectationsLow Expectations
MaterialsLow ExpectationsLow Expectations
UtilitiesLow ExpectationsLow Expectations
HealthcareLow ExpectationsNeutral Expectations
IndustrialNeutral ExpectationsLow Expectations
Consumer GoodsLow ExpectationsLow Expectations
TechnologyHigh ExpectationsNeutral Expectations
FinancialsLow ExpectationsNeutral Expectations
Consumer ServicesHigh ExpectationsHigh Expectations
TelecommunicationsHigh ExpectationsHigh Expectations
Real EstateHigh ExpectationsNeutral Expectations
Average Total Market Low ExpectationsLow Expectations
S&P 500Low ExpectationsLow Expectations
Nasdaq 100High ExpectationsHigh Expectations
Dow 30 IndustrialsLow ExpectationsLow Expectations
   
High Expectations  
Low Expectations  
Neutral Expectations  


In this update of the Expectations indicator the largest moves in expectations occurred in Technology going from high to neutral expectations and Consumer Services which has stayed at high expectations, but in the actual data increased rather significantly.

Healthcare has gone from low to neutral expectations maybe showing a pause. Industrial has moved from neutral to low expectations. Real Estate has moved from high to neutral expectations. From the data, it looks like the market has relatively high expectations for the retail sales report due Wednesday.

From the Expectations Indicator report it looks like the Dow 30 and S&P 500 will still look to move higher on the shoulders of basic materials, industrials, utilities and energy. The market may show weakness in the overly speculated sectors (over the past few months) in preparation for the retail sales numbers.

Corrections: On the May 6th, 2009 Expectation Indicator update had two errors due to poor data entry. Real Estate was should have been high rather than neutral expectations, financials should have been low rather than high expectations and lastly the overall market average was low not neutral expectations. Remember this is a new indicator and errors can happen. It is still in the concept stage and the process of gathering the data is new.

Since the Expectations Indicator concept is new, only time will prove this it useful or useless. This indicator will continue to be released until proven not useful. The indicator is for information purposes only and is not meant to constitute any type of financial advice. We also do not guarantee the accuracy of the above information and at any point may alter, change the process of producing it and or discontinue it.

Bank Stress Test – Possible Train Wreck?

Friday, May 8th, 2009

File:Train wreck at Montparnasse 1895.jpgSince the announcement of the Bank Stress Test the US Government has been promising a level of transparency that was suppose to shed light on the real condition of the largest banks in the USA. The official results were announced at 5:00 PM EST but the actual results had been leaked to the press over that past two weeks.

With the test scores in, Wall Street seems unsurprised by the results. The US Government seems to have spent more effort on releasing the information so as not to disrupt the markets, than realistically testing the banks. This test was supposed to see if banks could handle another future financial earthquake. Instead it seems to have tested if they could handle what may be a best case scenario.

The US government used both a worst case scenario and a more “probable case” to test the possible financial needs of Americas 19 largest banks. The “probable case” unemployment for this year has already been met. The Federal Reserve Chairman during his last testimony to congress stressed the increasingly concerning commercial real estate industry, but the test puts little weight to it. The Bank Stress test seemed to be more political propaganda to spur optimism than a true test of structural integrity.

Consumer credit was released today showing consumers paid down debt $11.1 billion in April instead of the forecasted reduction of $4.2 billion. The consumer still appears to be concerned about debt reduction than expansion. The backbone of the US governments recovery plan is to expand lending and spur consumer spending.

United States Railroad freight traffic was down 23 percent in April and 18.2% year to date. Railroads move raw goods around America. The Association of American Railroads Senior Vice President John T. Gray was quoted in a released statement “Unfortunately, it’s hard to find much in rail traffic data in April to support the idea that the economy is starting to see ‘green shoots’ … it may still just be weeds”. How can manufacturing be recovering without the raw goods to make products?

The Economic Wave Set

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

Warren Buffet has been quoted as saying that the larger the stone dropped into water the bigger the waves. The stone dropped that started this financial crisis was definitely a large one. Here is my interpretation of the waves that follow the stone dropping. These waves can overlap but traditionally are made up of peaks and troughs.

The “stone” dropped was the Real Estate market bubble popping. The stone impacting the water was in September 2009 when the financial markets all but shut down clogged with bad debt. When the financial system receives a shock as it did in September, the effects are felt in waves.


The first wave typically comes in the form of fear. If you asked the average US citizen what happen in September 2009, most would not be able to detail the actual impact. But this fear causes the average US consumer to stop spending as much and plan for the worst. During this financial crisis the initial fear coupled with real estate prices falling, caused an extreme contraction in consumer spending. Since 70% of US GDP comes from consumer spending, this contraction leads to the second wave.

The second wave is usually a direct result of the first wave. When consumers spend significantly less, companies are forced to reduce inventory to match this new reduced demand. This reduction in inventory typically causes high unemployment. High unemployment leads us to the third wave.

The third wave again is usually a direct result of the second wave. High unemployment with reduced consumer spending leaves a supply surplus. Actual goods surplus is reduced by lowering prices to what consumers are willing to spend to spur demand. With less demand overall for goods and services, square footage becomes a surplus, which is commercial real estate.

I believe that near term future of the US economy is largely dependent on the third wave. If the consumer can put aside their reduced wealth, fear of job loss and return to over consumption then the economy should start to recover (for the short term). If the consumer cannot jump start the economy, then commercial real estate could be the next stone dropped and we would start all over.

Expectations Indicator – Updated 5/6/09

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

The theory behind the Expectations Indicator is that it is easier to exceed low expectations than high ones. For more information on the Expectations Indicator click here.

Expectations Indicator for Week of May 3rd, 2009
Sector / Index5/3/20095/6/2009
EnergyLow ExpectationsLow Expectations
MaterialsLow ExpectationsLow Expectations
UtilitiesLow ExpectationsLow Expectations
HealthcareHigh ExpectationsLow Expectations
IndustrialLow ExpectationsNeutral Expectations
Consumer GoodsHigh ExpectationsLow Expectations
TechnologyHigh ExpectationsHigh Expectations
FinancialsLow ExpectationsHigh Expectations
Consumer ServicesHigh ExpectationsHigh Expectations
TelecommunicationsHigh ExpectationsHigh Expectations
Real EstateHigh ExpectationsNeutral Expectations
Average Total Market Low ExpectationsNeutral Expectations
S&P 500High ExpectationsLow Expectations
Nasdaq 100High ExpectationsHigh Expectations
Dow 30 IndustrialsLow ExpectationsLow Expectations
   
High Expectations  
Low Expectations  
Neutral Expectations  


In this mid week Expectations Indicator update there has been several changes in expectations. The largest move in expectations was in financials where they went from low to high, the real data actually showed an 80% change in expectations.

Healthcare had gone from high to low expectations, actually the real data really showed that the market overall raised its expectations and Healthcare stayed the same. Industrials went from high to neutral expectations showing that that this sector possibly has topped out. Consumer goods went from high to low expectations showing the market seems to be shifting to risk adverse staples. Real estate went from low to neutral expectations, again this was a case where the expectations for real estate stayed the same but the overall market expectations where raised.

The overall market expectations where raised from low to neutral expectations. The S&P 500 went from high to low expectations caused by the lowered expectations in consumer staples and energy which are currently heavily weighted in the index.

Since the Expectations Indicator concept is new, only time will prove this it useful or useless. This indicator will be released weekly until proven not useful. Going forward we will also be using popular Indexes to measure its success from the previous week. The indicator is for information purposes only and is not meant to constitute any type of financial advice. We also do not guarantee the accuracy of the above information and at any point may alter, change the process of producing it and or discontinue it.

What are the Real Mortgage Rates?

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

The financial crisis is largely being blamed on the housing bubble that recently popped. Existing and New home sales had fallen considerably over the past year. Not till recently has there been a pause in the dramatic decline. This current pause has been largely attributed to the efforts of the US Government by supporting low mortgage rates and providing a home buyer tax break.

With foreclosures on the rise and property values around the USA still falling, what happens if the government runs out of political will and stops supporting the market?

Credit card rates have been steadily rising over the past few months as default rates have been gaining momentum. With very little political will for credit card debt, banks are forced to raise rates to help offset the rising risk. Over the same period of rising defaults there has also been a reduction in credit card use.

Without a doubt risk has increased on Mortgage financing. What happens when the US Government takes the “training wheels” off? Is the real estate market stabilizing or just reacting to short term government intervention?

Bank Stress Test – At Least 1 then, now 10 need Funds?

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

On Friday April 24th, 2009 the US Government released the parameters of their imposed stress test on the 19 largest banks in the USA. This release acknowledged that at least one of the banks involved in the test needed additional capital. On Tuesday May 5th 2009, information has leaked out that possibly 10 of the 19 banks will need additional funds.

The stress test results are scheduled to be released on Thursday May 7th, 2009. Since the release of the parameters on April 24th, information has been suspiciously disseminated seemly to soften the blow of the tests findings. So far from the information released, it appears over 50% of 19 largest banks in the USA need more money.


With still a couple days until the results are released, one has to consider if there will be more than 10. With the diminished political will towards Wall Street the obvious first step towards these banks raising the necessary capital will be to convert the US governments preferred shares (from TARP funds they received) to common equity. This conversion, which would alleviate debt from their balance sheets, would essentially put these banks one step towards nationalization.

Over two months ago the US Markets plunged to new lows on fears on banks being nationalized. Now it appears that the US government is inches from nationalization of some of the largest banks in the USA. If over 50% of the largest banks need money, what about the mid and small sized banks? Where will the funds come from?

Q1 Earnings Down 35% Year over Year – Bull Market?

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

With over 50% of companies earnings reported so far, earnings appear about 35% lower (of the S&P 500 included stocks) than last year’s same period. At the beginning of the year, analyst only expected 12.5% lower. Even with earnings so much lower than forecasted at the beginning of the year, expectations where reduced so dramatically over the quarter that that over two thirds of earnings have exceeded estimates so far.


Healthcare seems to have held off the impact of the recession with a 2.2% average growth over last year. Consumer discretionary companies have felt the most dramatic effect with an average earnings decline of 96.8% over last year. Interesting though how the Healthcare Sector Spider ETF (XLV) is down -8.66% this year and the Consumer Discretionary Sector Spider ETF (XLY) is up 5.27% for the year.

Although expectations where clearly lowered in the first quarter, the second quarter remains largely unchanged. Earnings are expected to be down 20% year over year in the second quarter and just a 4% drop in the third.

Wall Street seems to be either too pessimistic or overly optimistic. So the question is whether the future estimates are overly optimistic of too pessimistic? If Wall Street is ends up being too optimistic then we will likely retest the lows of early March 2009. If Wall Street turns out to be too pessimistic then we may have more to gain. The question is do you think earnings next quarter only declined 20% over last year’s same period?